Time travel with Seiko to 1965 with the 62MAS Diver’s Re-Creation and the 1970s with a Diver’s Modern Interpretation of a Turtle.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/358be/358be8d9d25f2cbe059d3de9ab9e1086a9478744" alt=""
The 62MAS is back (again)! Hold on a minute; is anyone else getting a strong sense of deju vu? Wasn’t a blue 62MAS already re-released once before, and quite recently, too?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/281bf/281bfdb7aa59ad6886689de05df35a60aff32e65" alt=""
It was indeed, but this one, ref. SLA043 / JDM ref. SBDX039 has some subtle aesthetic changes over the Hi-Beat, ref.
SLA037J1, as well as one major mechanical change which means it’s a little more affordable. Here’s a side by side for you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dd93/9dd93ab62babc10229f4edb80092f1bdf8073ea4" alt=""
Because Seiko aren’t done celebrating their 55th Anniversary, they have decided to release a duo of blue Prospex divers. Oh, and one additional black 62MAS variant (not really a celebration) but it also came out this week in Japan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ba9e/3ba9ef0f61dd40acb6ec1a96c1cd4fe5061d532b" alt=""
In March of this year, Seiko fans were blessed by the holy
TRINITY of Prospex divers; today one of those watches, the 62MAS Re-Creation is back as alternative Diver’s Re-Creation along with ref. SPB183 / JDM ref. SBDC123 AKA a Diver’s Modern Interpretation of the 1970s Turtle.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acd64/acd64140b02d3f587a6fe0f574f5f8dc7993a78d" alt=""
Seriously, I know it’s my job but F me, Seiko are flooding the living sh!t out of the market with all these watches so called re-edition, recreation LEs. I do hope they’re done with celebrating for the next 5 years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b2ff/0b2ff83bcf47e880bf01e19cd08accbf16ee9206" alt=""
Here’s the lowdown on the new modern, affordable, 62MAS ref. SLA043. Its 39.9 by 47.9 by 14.1mm Stainless case is water-resistant to 200m and houses a 26 jewel 8L35 auto which has an accuracy of +15 to -10 seconds per day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82e2c/82e2c5b46f80c231a7d45bd1a7738f68f510fa5a" alt=""
Vintage features include: a box-shaped sapphire crystal and rubber waffle strap. Apart from the absence of Hi-Beat on its dial, the 26 instead of 37 jewel text; it also has a blue seconds hand. You can get the same watch in black as ref. SBDX041, but only in Japan so far.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13991/13991dcb626f4e0623628d10bc72d957ccc55f0f" alt=""
The blue dial is a Limited Edition of 1’700 pieces whereas there are only 300 pieces of the black (a true LE). MSRP for both variants is 528,000 JPY.
These watches also get a vintage whale motif on their case-backs. Hopefully Japanese Seiko fans don't look at that and think yummy?!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61189/6118970654aa43f282a60a0253539d4089fa325e" alt=""
Next up is the blue Turtle Diver’s Modern Interpretation ref. SPB183. Its 42.7 by 46.6 by 13.2mm Stainless case with DiaShield coating is water-resistant to 200m and houses a 24 jewel 6R35 auto which has an accuracy of +25 to -15 seconds per day.
It is a Limited Edition of 5’500 pieces and has an MSRP of 165,000 JPY.
STOP WHALING in JAPAN
Hello , the case back artwork on the Limited Seiko Prospex 55th is of a Dolphin. This relates to the conservation documentary work carried out by the Cousteau family. Seiko have covertly, unintentionally i think paid respect to Jacques Cousteau Snr. The Families relationship with Seiko ended abruptly in the early seventies. Cousteau Snr was a pioneering marine conservationist. please feel free to fact check and let me know if i am incorrect on the Artwork. Cheers John, Brisbane
ReplyDeleteThank you! I don't think a brand from a whale eating nation should be using the legendary JYC's whale / dolphin imagery on their watches unless they are doing something to conserve them. Thanks again for the input!
ReplyDelete